The story of Korach and his followers is a common theme throughout history. A prime example would be the Mutiny on the Bounty. What happened to the mutineers tells us what would have happened if Korach had prevailed.
Now for a quick devar Torah.
This week’s parshah, Parshat Korach, contains a lesson that repeats itself throughout human history.
Korach leads a rebellion against Moshe. On the surface, his complaints sound perfectly reasonable. Who appointed Moshe? Why should Aharon be the High Priest? Isn’t that nepotism? If the entire nation is holy, shouldn’t leadership be more democratic?
These are logical questions. The problem, as the Torah makes clear, is that Korach and many of his followers were not motivated by concern for the people. They were motivated by concern for themselves. They dressed personal ambition in the language of principle.
This reminds me of an episode from British naval history: the famous Mutiny on the Bounty.
Captain William Bligh was a strict disciplinarian. After the ship spent months in Tahiti, many of the sailors became attached to the easy life there and no longer wanted to continue the voyage. Under the leadership of Fletcher Christian, they mutinied, seized the ship, and cast Bligh and eighteen loyal men adrift in a small open boat.
What happened next is remarkable. Bligh navigated more than 4,000 miles across the Pacific in terrible conditions and brought almost all of his men safely to civilization. Far from being disgraced, he was acquitted at his court-martial and eventually rose to the rank of Rear Admiral.
The mutineers, meanwhile, established themselves on Pitcairn Island. Yet their rebellion did not produce the paradise they imagined. Violence, murder, and internal conflict followed. Most of the mutineers died violently. The dream of freedom without discipline collapsed into chaos.
Only later did one survivor, John Adams, help establish a stable and religious community on the island.
The story illustrates an important truth. Rebellion is easy. Governing is hard.
Throughout history, people have often become frustrated with leaders and institutions. Sometimes that frustration is justified. But before embracing change, we must ask a simple question: What comes next?
The Russian people were unhappy with the Tsar. The government that followed proved even more oppressive. Many Germans wanted change during the crisis years of the early 1930s. The change they received brought catastrophe. History repeatedly teaches that removing authority is easier than replacing it with something better.
Moshe understood this. He never sought power. At the Burning Bush, he repeatedly tried to avoid the position. Yet when God insisted, Moshe accepted the responsibility because someone had to lead. The same was true of Yehoshua. He did not seek greatness for its own sake. He accepted leadership because the nation needed leadership.
That may be the deepest lesson of Korach. The best leaders are often the ones who never wanted the job in the first place. They take it because it must be done. They understand that leadership is not a privilege; it is a burden and a responsibility.
Korach wanted the honor of leadership. Moshe accepted the responsibility of leadership. The Torah leaves no doubt which model creates a stable society.
Something to think about.
Leave a Reply